Heart, Soul, and Objectivity

While discussing the pieces we had to read for Core 2 last night, I felt like I was having heart failure after I realized how much research (time, effort, energy, money, brainpower, etc.) went into writing every one of those articles.  The longer I sat on class, the more panicked I felt about conducting all of this research, a feeling that was only compounded after Dr. Wolff went over the requirements for our research proposals (due by Sunday, by the way).

My first thought: What the HELL am I going to write about?

My second thought: How am I going to be able to remain objective towards my topic after compiling months and months worth of research?

I remember while reading Amy Ellis Nutt’s piece and thinking how difficult it must have been for her to, after shadowing this man and his family for an extended period of time, remain objective towards her topic of research.  This story was her baby, something she nurtured from inception and watched it grow and flourish into the amazing article that it is today, but at some/multiple points while conducting her research, she must have had to remove all of her emotional attachment and examine her piece critically.

As a writer, I think that can be the most difficult thing to do.  To write is to put your heart and soul into every piece you create, and to take a step back and really think about what you’ve managed to do so far and how much farther you have to go can be a daunting task to undertake.

This class will be challenging, but I’m hoping it will push me to push myself more than I ever have before.

Now all I have to do is think of a topic and then I can start….

4 Comments to “Heart, Soul, and Objectivity”

  1. Yes… I am deathly afraid of all the research that looms ahead of me… It feels impossible for a little student like me to pull off.

    I really really really wish that I could offer you suggestions, but I made Matt offer me suggestions to get me started, haha!

    You’ll think of something; don’t stress too much!

  2. My second thought: How am I going to be able to remain objective towards my topic after compiling months and months worth of research?

    Well, objectivity is needed while doing the research. That is, being open and non-judgmental.

    But, depending on how you decide to compose your piece, you can be quite nonobjective, just as David Foster Wallace is. During the experience I suspect he was quite open-minded, but his piece is all about him.

  3. Ok, breathe. Both of you (yes, that’s you too, Darlene). Don’t look at the mountain. Look for the first spot you’ll grab a handhold. And that is the idea. All you have to do right now is throw a bunch of ideas in the air and see which one bounces the highest. You’ll know by your eventual interest in one and by our responses, etc. Just list lots of ideas right now.

    By Sunday, which is plenty of time if you don’t panic, you can choose one and write up a research proposal. Don’t worry about everything else. You’ll be amazed at what you’ll be able to accomplish. But one step at a time. Now, what ideas have begun to creep into your mind? I know you have some, now is the time to share…

  4. I’m having the same overwhelming feeling so I guess that’s natural. I keep waiting for a light bulb to go off in my brain as the Jeopardy theme song plays in the background.

    Julianna, I get what you’re saying about objectivity, but I wonder if it’s completely necessary. In the case of Tracey Ross, I don’t think it could have been written objectively, at least not from her point of view. I guess it depends on the topic. Even in “Shipping Out,” Wallace filters his experience through the tiny lens of his porthole (and the vast lens of his brain). His experience is both informed and highly subjective. So maybe it depends on the genre and style as well.

    Good luck with a topic and whatever genre you choose! Hopefully the light bulb goes off by tomorrow 🙂

Leave a comment